Subscribe
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Kevin on Tim Murray to Resign
- Maurice T. Cunningham on Sandy Hook Was Good for Business
- Anthony DeGregorio on Sandy Hook Was Good for Business
- Maurice T. Cunningham on Sandy Hook Was Good for Business
- Philip F. Filosa on Sandy Hook Was Good for Business
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
- Beacon Hill Institute
- Commonwealth Magazine
- Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
- Ideas Matter!
- Larry Becker's 270 Electoral Votes Blog
- Mass Benchmarks
- Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center
- Massachusetts Taxpayers Association
- MassInc
- New England Economic Partnership
- New England Journal of Political Science
- Pioneer Institute
- Pollways
- The Invisible Primary
- The Martin Institute
- The Math of Politics
- The Mischiefs of Faction
- The Monkey Cage
- WickedLocal.com/Politics
Meta
Tag Archives: Nate Silver
How Realistic Is a Newt Win?
Here’s an interesting take on the Republican nominating process from Nate Silver at 538 Politics, Did Gingrich’s Win Break the Paradigm? Silver considers two competing narratives. First that Romney will win the nomination because the establishment confers on him the money and organizational strength that always succeeds in the long haul and enables the establishment candidate to withstand reversals such as South Carolina. The narrative that challenges that paradigm is “this time it’s different” – 2012 is an outlier, Romney is a drab and unappealing candidate, passion runs so strongly for a strong conservative that the establishment loses and the populist outsider sweeps toward the nomination. Part of the traditional story is that a challenger in as much trouble as Newt was following New Hampshire sees his money and organizational appeal dissipate. But what has happened here is that perhaps Gingrich couldn’t raise money, but Sheldon Adelson pumped five million dollars into attacking Romney in South Carolina and that made the difference. And that means “this time it’s different.” So read the provocative article at 538 Politics.