- Headlines for Tuesday, June 18, 2013 » MASSterList on Markey and Gomez: Strengths and Weaknesses
- JeroldDuquette on The Turnout Question: The Last Refuge of Horse Race Journalists.
- Brad Lovoi on The Turnout Question: The Last Refuge of Horse Race Journalists.
- Mass. Senate Race May Be Feeling Washington Scandal Fallout | my blog on Markey Slips on Obama’s Banana Peel
- Conspiracy Theories! | Mass. Senate Race May Be Feeling Washington Scandal Fallout – NPR on Markey Slips on Obama’s Banana Peel
Tag Archives: John Walsh
Gabriel Gomez is not the second coming of Scott Brown, he who seems to be spending a good deal of time lately in New Hampshire. And June 2013 will not be a replay of January 2010. With respect to Dame Shirley Bassey, it’s not all just a little bit of history repeating.
Recently important figures in both parties have spoken up about the advantages of vigorous primary contests. Democratic Party chairman John Walsh wrote an opinion piece for the Boston Globe entitled Contested Primary Good for Democrats. Redmassgroup.com poster Matt Elder, a Marlborough city councilor, even called for a “bloody primary” on the Republican side.
This week I had the pleasure to interview John Walsh, the chairman of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, for UMass Boston’s public affairs radio program Commonwealth Journal on WUMB (interview will play Sunday at 7:00PM). As you might imagine Chairman Walsh was quite pleased with the November election results. He was especially enthusiastic with robust turnout in communities of color and praised rising elected officials like Boston city councilors Ayanna Pressley and Tito Jackson and state senator Sonia Chang-Diaz. We’ll surely hear more from them in the future but, I asked Chairman Walsh, what about the future John Walshs – the behind the scenes architects of political victory? Actually, he told me, many of them were recently identified in an important article in The Bay State Banner, Diversity more than a buzz word at Warren campaign.
With polls opening in one days time, we’ve some thoughts on the state of the race and some other races that have gotten a bit less attention.
Professor Cunningham: As we await the traditional opening of the polls for Election Day tomorrow, some closing thoughts on campaigns we’ve discussed and some of the politics we’ve not examined as closely.
We’ve certainly talked about the Scott Brown-Elizabeth Warren race. Few US senate races are highly competitive in Massachusetts and not many have attracted the quality of candidates that this one has. I don’t put enormous stock in every TV advertisement that runs but I think the last ads by Senator Brown and Elizabeth Warren capture some of the essence of the choice each represents.
The Globe had a story yesterday about a lawsuit filed against the chair of the Massachusetts Republican Party. This is the latest in a series of problems hovering around the state’s nearly insignificant minority party.
Recently the Washington Post published an article that exposed one of the ugly truths of presidential campaign politics, at least for reporters and the political junkies who avidly follow each twist and turn (and spin). Campaigns don’t matter that much – not Etch-A-Sketch, and not the president’s birth certificate. Political scientists have shown that the fundamentals – the economy, partisanship, and incumbency – matter far more in determining the outcome of a presidential election. So will campaigning matter in Massachusetts, for Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown, Richard Tisei and John Tierney?
Massachusetts politics descended upon Sandwich this weekend. Again. We are used to it because we have the benefit of having competitive two party politics. It is a battleground for both parties. Since 2002 a Republican has held our state representative’s seat. We have a Democratic state Senator (who also happens to be the Senate President) and between this cycle and the previous cycle, we’ve been front and center as a model for what two party politics might look like in the state.
Jeff Jacoby offered a cautionary tale to Elizabeth Warren a couple of weeks ago by reminded his readers that the candidate favored by the party leadership is not always the favorite of the party faithful. Warren’s relationship to the grass roots of her party makes her unlikely to suffer Elliot Richardson’s fate in 1984. But being the favorite of party leaders at a time when said leaders are not very popular has its dilemmas. It turns out that walking the state may not be such a bad strategy.