- Mahmoud Heidarian on What if all media reporting and analysis of elections were done by political scientists?
- french language lessons online on The Stumbling and Bumbling Martha Coakley
- drusselljuiceplus on Politics in the Blogosphere, 5/12/2014 Edition
- Osvaldo on Charlie Baker’s Endorsement Speech
- Matt O'Brien on Massachusetts Madisonianism
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- January 2011
Category Archives: Boston Politics
The debate over residency requirements for municipal employees in Boston has heated up in response to Mayor Marty Walsh’s suggestion to relax the rule and a Boston Globe report showing how often the rule is flouted. The deeper debate is an old one, raising issues of both democratic society and the rule of law.
One of the many blessings of the annual New England Political Science Association meeting is that it offers a chance for emerging scholars to present their work. Once again we are pleased to present a blog post based on the work of young scholars studying under the tutelage of the first-rate faculty at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, this time on the efficacy of endorsements in the Boston mayor’s race.
Cameron Roche is a PhD graduate student at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is an Assistant Director of the Umass Poll and is a research assistant on the NSF Cooperative Congressional Election Survey (CCES), working under the direction of Professor Brian Schaffner. His research interests include: American Politics, Congressional Elections, and Political Psychology. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Keith Lema is a Fulbright Scholar and graduate of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He was a Political Science and Economics dual major and member of Phi Beta Kappa. He was an undergraduate research assistant for Umass Poll.
The 2013 Boston mayoral election between Marty Walsh and John Connolly, provided politics-junkies with quite a close finish. While Connolly led his opponent for most of the campaign, his good fortune faded by the end of October. On October 30th, UMass Poll became the first organization to predict a Walsh victory outside of the margin of error. A few days later, Suffolk University released a poll confirming Walsh’s newly acquired lead. Less than a week later, Connolly was congratulating Walsh over the phone and preparing his concession speech. To further understand this outcome, we looked to media groups for their narrative surrounding the election.
Most media outlets issued similar accounts of the election. They consistently credited Walsh as the “union” candidate who beat Connolly because of his superior ground game. Certainly, Walsh’s relationship with unions provided an influx of money, organization, as well as boots on the ground for his campaign. However, UMass Poll data revealed evidence of a more nuanced narrative about Walsh’s win over Connolly: our analysis shows that endorsements also played a critical role in Walsh’s victory.
Painful as the expulsion of Rep. Carlos Henriquez may have been for House members, it could have been worse. When Representative Frank Gethro was expelled in 1906, he was at the center of a bribery scandal in which the local district attorney subpoenaed the entire House. This was a problem because many of the legislators had in fact been taking bribes to kill a bill outlawing “bucket shops,” shady brokerage businesses that competed with established houses. For a scandal of that magnitude the House sought the one attorney who could deal with such monumental outrage, as Patrick S. Halley relates in his book Daniel Coakley: America’s Most Corrupt Politician.
An increasing cadre of Massachusetts politicians is showing up on what the Boston Herald terms “bombshell ‘sponsor’ lists” kept by the state Probation Department encompassing “stunning documents” detailing recommendation letters. So are politicians fleeing the frenzy?
Actually many of them proudly own up to their efforts to help constituents get jobs and some are utilizing my all-time favorite defense from James Michael Curley, the “I did it for a friend” excuse. The deftest channeler of The Rascal King has been none other than Attorney General Martha Coakley.
I write about the potential of the Olympic Games to foster greater international mutual understanding, even if unintentionally and indirectly.
My UMB Colleagues Tom Ferguson and Jie Chen with their collaborator Paul Jorgenson are just out in Salon with a dire caution: Big money is destroying American populism. They find some reason for optimism in the elections of Bill de Blasio in New York and Marty Walsh in Boston, driven forward by union money. Nonetheless, their research shows that our partisan politics is largely a contest of different factions of the one percent, more in the Republican Party than the Democratic Party. Still, populist Democrats have to confront the realities of their party’s funding sources.
As Professor Ubertaccio wrote yesterday we don’t have many formal ceremonies in politics. The inauguration of a new mayor is an important one so let me reflect on some positive qualities of our now former and newly inaugurated mayors, Tom Menino and Marty Walsh.
Inaugural events are bigger than the people taking an oath of office. That’s why Mayor Menino should be at the Conte Forum today.
The other day I posted AFT Proud and argued that the American Federation of Teachers secret half-million dollar expenditure on behalf of Marty Walsh’s campaign for mayor of Boston should be considered an emblem of a corrupt campaign finance system. Some fellow Twitterers were dismayed that I would use the word corruption but I stand by the word and its meaning.
CSI Campaign Finance, aka Wesley Lowery of The Boston Globe, continues to unravel the mystery money spent on behalf of Marty Walsh by independent expenditure groups. On December 27 Lowery published American Federation of Teachers revealed as funder behind mysterious pro-Walsh PAC during campaign. Oddly the AFT spokespersons seem very proud of their secret $480,000 contribution to democracy. Their conduct suggests something other than pride; it reveals the corruption at the heart of our campaign finance farce-ocracy.