Mr. Maginn or Mr. Magoo?

Is it Mr. Maginn or Mr. Magoo? It’s a worthwhile question to ask as Robert Maginn generates the sort of headlines that are making him the face of the Massachusetts Republican Party. And in a year when the November ballot is likely to be headed by former governor Mitt Romney and U.S. Senator Scott Brown, that is not good.

Robert Maginn was elected chairman of the Massachusetts Republican Party in November 2011 and is an ally of both Romney and Brown, especially valued for his fund-raising ability. He is also the CEO of an educational software company called Jenzabar.

Mr. Magoo was a bumbling cartoon character who managed to get in and out of trouble in amusing fashion. Magoo was wealthy and much of his trouble was caused by his severe nearsightedness. Maginn is starting to look a lot like Magoo: wealthy and politically myopic.

The latest evidence of Maginn’s nearsightedness arose yesterday when the Boston Globe reported that he had hired a GOP consultant – not for the state party, but for Jenzabar. While providing services to Jenzabar consultant Rob Willington is also going to work for the party, as the Globe reports on an email from Maginn to committee members, “at zero net cost to our party operations.’’  Which raises the rather obvious question, pursued by the drive-by liberal media types at the Globe, of an illegal corporate contribution to the party. Maginn did not return calls from the Globe, leaving it to a party spokesman to apply the fig leaf to his actions.

It isn’t as if Maginn couldn’t have seen the controversy coming. After he was elected chairman he announced that he had hired former GOP congressmen Peter Blute and Peter Torkildsen – again at Jenzabar, not the party. Torkildsen is himself a former chair of the state party and he and Blute are also expected to volunteer for the state GOP.

In between doing what he can for the state’s job creation picture at Jenzabar, the news broke that Maginn had made the maximum contribution of $500.00 to Governor Deval Patrick’s reelection campaign. He had also contributed $2400.00 to New York Democratic U.S. Senator Charles Schumer. As my colleague Professor Duquette has pointed out, a business person of one party contributing to the other party is simply business as usual, although this may be hard for the party’s true believers to accept. The conservative Massachusetts Republican Assembly sent out an online petition seeking Maginn’s resignation. The petition was signed by former Greater Boston Tea Party leader Christen Varley. Maginn also tried to steer the party into an endorsement of Mitt Romney for president, despite the fact that a state party usually remains neutral since different members will be supporting various candidates. That effort was papered over by the representation that Maginn only intended his personal support for Romney, a former colleague at Bain & Co.

So far Maginn has gotten good marks for his fund-raising prowess. But to make progress against the Democrats the GOP needs to cloak itself in the mantle of reform. And I mean a much broader and encompassing manner of reform than tinkering with pension benefits or the rights of unionized municipal workers to veto changes to management of their health care plans. The Republicans need to develop a comprehensive platform for overhauling the way political business is done in the commonwealth. Stashing operatives on the corporate payroll, funding the opposition to protect one’s business position, trying to wire the party endorsement for a political ally – those moves are positively Democratic.

Oh Magoo, you’ve done it again.

About Maurice T. Cunningham

Maurice T. Cunningham is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Massachusetts at Boston. He teaches courses in American government including Massachusetts Politics, The American Presidency, Catholics in Political Life, The Political Thought of Abraham Lincoln, American Political Thought, and Public Policy. His book Maximization, Whatever the Cost: Race, Redistricting and the Department of Justice examines the role of the DOJ in requiring states to maximize minority voting districts in the Nineties. He has published articles dealing with the role of the Catholic Church in Massachusetts politics and on party politics in the state. His research interests focus upon the changing political culture of Massachusetts. Professor Cunningham is a regular contributor to the online magazine CommonwealthMagazine.org. He is a former assistant district attorney and assistant attorney general in Massachusetts. Professor Cunningham is a lifelong resident of Massachusetts. He earned his BA at the University of Massachusetts at Boston, his JD at New England School of Law, and PhD at Boston College. He lives in Cambridge with his wife and two children.
This entry was posted in Mass Politics and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Mr. Maginn or Mr. Magoo?

  1. Neil Sagan says:

    You describe Maginn questionable acts as “positively Democratic” without citing cases that justify the description.

    What do we know about Jenzabar corporate governance and the boards/shareholders approval for this allocation of resources?

    • Maurice T. Cunningham says:

      Neil,

      The larger point is that the Republicans need to establish themselves as the reformers in state government in contrast to Democratic ethical shortcomings. So you could look at Sal DiMasi, Dianne Wilkerson, former Auditor Joe DeNucci stashing relatives on the payroll, his successor not understanding that she can’t claim a prime residence in two municipalities at the same time to gain a tax advantage, former congressman Delahunt oddly benefiting from a no-bid contract on an issue he influenced while in Congress . . . I suppose we could go on but there is enough to suggest the Democrats might have an ethical weakness that could be exploited. I’m leaving aside the ‘three speakers’ story which I believe is overblown and the Probation Department story which I am also skeptical about. But you must admit, on good government, the Democrats have left an opening or two.

  2. Pingback: GOP Establishment Has Declared War on The Tea Party – Did the First Battle Occur against MA Tea Parties? | Mass Tea Party – Massachusetts Tea Party

  3. Pingback: GOP Establishment Has Declared War on The Tea Party – Was the First Shot Fired Against MA Tea Parties? | North Shore Tea Party

  4. Pingback: Political Odds and Ends September 17 | MassPoliticsProfs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>